Archive for Social Networking/Web 2.0

Let us help you put a video on your web site today for under $99.00- Everything done

Video on your site

Video on your site  This is why your should have a video on your web site.  Let us help you today. Here are some examples of work we can do.  What would you like and what is your budget?  Please email George@apibestinclass.com manager of video productions to help you.
 Video like other content formats, needs to be thought of as just another piece of the puzzle and that means giving it the same amount of attention as content like text and static images. Granted, it’s not always the easiest thing to accomplish, full integration.

Read more

On Line Learning– Photography Social Media Learning – No charge- Just Register

Click below for Social Media

 

How your memories can be twisted under social pressure

 

Is your amygdala lying to your hippocampus? (Credit: Weizmann Institute)

Listen up, Facebook and Twitter groupies: how easily can social pressure affect your memory?

Very easily, researchers at the Weizmann Institute and University College London have proved, and they think they even know what part of the brain is responsible.


The participants conformed to the group on these “planted” responses, giving incorrect answers nearly 70% of the time.

Volunteers watched a documentary film in small groups. Three days later, they returned to the lab individually to take a memory test, answering questions about the film. They were also asked how confident they were in their answers.

They were later invited back to the lab to retake the test. This time, the subjects were also given supposed answers of the others in their film-viewing group (along with social-media-style photos) while being scanned in a functional MRI (fMRI) that revealed their brain activity.

Is most of what you know false?

Planted among these were false answers to questions the volunteers had previously answered correctly and confidently. The participants conformed to the group on these “planted” responses, giving incorrect answers nearly 70% of the time.

To determine if their memory of the film had actually undergone a change, the researchers invited the subjects back to the lab later to take the memory test once again, telling them that the answers they had previously been fed were not those of their fellow film watchers, but random computer generations.

Some of the responses reverted back to the original, correct ones, but get this: despite finding out the scientists messed with their minds, close to half of their responses remained erroneous, implying that the subjects were relying on false memories implanted in the earlier session.

An analysis of the fMRI data showed a strong co-activation and connectivity between two brain areas: the hippocampus and the amygdala. Social reinforcement could act on the amygdala to persuade our brains to replace a strong memory with a false one, the researchers suggest.

Ref.: Yadin Dudai, et al., Following the Crowd: Brain Substrates of Long-Term Memory Conformity. Science, 2011; 333 (6038): 108-111 [DOI: 10.1126/science.1203557]

Eyez without a Facebook — live video lifelogging!

This just in from Aussie HIVE45 vidcaster Nathan Waters: “Someone is finally making *normal-looking* tech recording glasses! I have no affiliation with this product, but I would absolutely love if you added it to the news section to encourage more pledges for their Kickstarter funding. Here’s the link: Eyez by ZionEyez HD Video Recording Glasses for Facebook. “The issue so far has been that the tech glasses have been bulky and ugly… so very keen to get ahold of these ones.”

What? I want one — now! Let’s see: 720P HD cam, mic, 8GB flash memory, Bluetooth, mini-USB charging/download port, iPhone/Android app, removable lenses, hands-free video recorded (3 hours) or streamed live via Qik or LiveStream…. Oh, yeah!

Think of the possibilities: live TV/radio reporting (when will some TV network get it?), sousveillance (TSA groper patdown monitoring, anyone?), instant Facebook videos, lifelogging (perhaps into Lifenaut one day?)….

Speaking of, this is a must-see: The Museum of Me — you and your Facebook friends converted into an art museum exhibition: photos, faces flying by, ending in a magnificent 3-D connected graph of your Facebook friends. Slightly creepy, but beautifully done and fascinating….

OK, back to Eyez. This is a Kickstarter project (if enough investors pledge $1 or more, ZionEyez can go ahead with the project). So far, 169 backers have pledged $25,119 toward the $55,000 goal by July 31. It’s being designed by engineers who designed the now-obsolete FLIP video cams. Scheduled for Winter 2011 release.

Hmm… what if a future version could have a built-in display connected to a future iPhone/iPad/Android device — a perfect augmented reality system with live updating from/to the cloud… two-way live Facebook/Twitter/Quora updates and two-way mobile Skype video…. But is this the end of privacy —  the transparent society, 1984, Gattaca?

Meanwhile, back in 2011, I just pledged. Goes through your Amazon.com account — instant. Make that 170 backers.

Robots invent spoken language, join Facebook

OK, I just made up the Facebook part, but IEEE Spectrum reported Tuesday on two robots that communicate linguistically like humans and invent new words. Spooky.

They’re called “Lingodroids” (reminds me of Stephen King’s even spookier The Langoliers, which were robotic monsters dealing with a “time rip”).

(credit: Ruth Schulz)

Researchers at the University of Queensland and Queensland University of Technology in Australia have designed the Lingodroids as a mobile platform equipped with camera, laser range finder, and sonar for mapping and obstacle avoidance. The robots also carry a microphone and speakers to “talk” to each other.

If one of the robots finds itself in an unfamiliar area, it’ll make up a word to describe it, choosing a random combination from a set of syllables. It then communicates that word to the other robot. (Sounds like what children often do.)

Lingo Droid

A game allows the Lingodroid robots (A) to develop and test their lexicon by specifying a target location (B) to meet at (credit: Ruth Schulz)

The robots then play games with each other to reinforce the language. For example, one robot might say “kuzo,” and then, both robots will race to where they think “kuzo” is. When they meet at the same place, that reinforces the connection between a word and a location.

In the future, researchers hope to enable the Lingodroids to “talk” about even more elaborate concepts, like descriptions of how to get to a place or the accessibility of places on the map, Spectrum points out. Ultimately, techniques like this may help robots to communicate with each other more effectively, and may even enable novel ways for robots to talk to humans.

Social networking for robots?

Let’s take it a step further. How about turning these bots (actually, many bots) loose in some kind of rich environment, like a simulated mall? Then you could connect them up to Amazon’s Mechanical Turk service, where people could remotely see what the robots are doing and help them learn (or some will mess with their minds).

Once these bots got really smart (and Asimov’s three laws of robotics, plus other laws, were drilled into them), you might turn them loose in the real world. Imagine bots driving around in autonomous Google cars, delivering pizza.

OK, now I’m scaring myself.

Eventually, the bots could evolve their own social life, keeping each other informed and writing silly little notes to each other. (Would they then be facebots?) They could also add information from the real world (using “Internet of things” data) and have their own IP numbers and email addresses. (Hmm, probably a bad idea: think spambots.)

It’s a small step from there to our facebots replacing DMV clerks, consumer help operators, McDonald’s counter workers (“DO.YOU.WANT.CHIPS.WITH.THAT.BURGER?”) and website editors.

Sorry I brought it up.

book review | Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other

In 1938, existentialist philosopher Jean Paul Sartre wrote “Hell is other people.” Sartre may never have cobbled together his existential philosophy that viewed human individuals as utterly alone — alienated, atomized beings in a vast meaningless universe — if he had grown up playing with social robots and holding others at a discreet psychological distance by communicating with them nearly exclusively via instant messaging.

According to Wikipedia, one of the first mentions of loneliness came from Shakespeare’s Coriolanus, but I’d bet I could find passages that fairly reek of loneliness and alienation sprinkled throughout most of written history… if only I had an intelligent search program that could comb through the classics and correlate for themes using archaic synonyms.

With Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less From Each Other (Basic Books, 2011), Dr. Sherry Turkle, the widely noted MIT professor and explorer of communications technology, human psychology and relationships, tries to convince us that today’s technologically enhanced loneliness and alienation has particularly dangerous characteristics. I’m not convinced, but I’m listening.

Let me put this into context. Alone Together is not a polemic. While Turkle is certainly out to make a point about (among other things) the possibility that the human-bot connection may satiate our need for human-to-human connection — ultimately leaving us poorer for it — the book is an enjoyable read. Turkle shares poignant and sometimes funny stories about children, seniors, and many folks in between interacting with today’s social robots. And she brings us the inner thoughts of teenagers and young adults as they explore their emotions, identities, and relationships in an entirely novel social milieu mediated by relatively new communications technologies

In one example, a 14 year old girl named Mona gets on Facebook believing it will be an opportunity to “broadcast the real me.” However, she immediately finds herself even more self-conscious. Turkle writes, “Mona worries that she does not have enough social life to make herself interesting. ‘What kind of a personal life should I say I have?’” This may seem like a small point, but it’s telling. Turkle talks to a number of teens and young adults who feel that their ability to communicate and relate to people spontaneously “in real life” has atrophied as the result of both the desire and the opportunity to present themselves instead in a considered manner (however brief such reflection may be) on Facebook. Issues of social status and approval and the potential permanence of Facebook posts subvert all tendencies toward the types of authentic, risky communications that might lead to healthy and interesting relationships.

Young people also talk to Ms. Turkle about navigating the emotional complexities of being always accessible via cell phone. And as instant messaging largely replaces phone calls as the major mode of at-a-distance communication, young people are afforded another opportunity to exchange the authenticity of real-time conversation for a calculated presentation.

But calculation, in Turkle’s exploration, is not the same thing as contemplation or deep thinking. Ms. Turkle worries that by being always tethered to one another via cellular communications — and by being continually distracted by 24/7 connectedness to information, entertainment and shallow interpersonal distraction, we are losing our ability to contemplate — to think…. deeply, privately, and at length.

“In democracy, perhaps we all need to begin with the assumption that everyone has something to hide, a zone of private action and reflection, one that must be protected no matter what our techno-enthusiasms. I am haunted by the sixteen-year-old boy who told me that when he needs to make a private call, he uses a pay phone that takes coins and complains how hard it is to find one in Boston. And I am haunted by the girl who summed up her reaction to losing online privacy by asking, ‘Who would care about me and my little life?’” — Sherry Turkle, Alone Together

Most human cultures have evolved over centuries. Their customs and taboos — in other words, their ways of presenting themselves and interacting with each other — have been deeply rooted and have changed slowly over long generations. Today — and into the foreseeable future — people are living in a new and constantly changing terrain for presentation and communication. We are making up the rules (if any), and finding out who we are in this context, as we go, and without an instruction manual. However optimistic and enthusiastic some of us may be about accelerating change, it behooves us to pay attention to the works of explorers of the deeply personal like Sherry Turkle, to insure that we expand — and not contract — the best aspects of our humanity.

Perhaps with social robots coming online and becoming ever better companions, human beings will simply rise to the competitive challenge to be better company than the bots — to be more empathetic, more thrilling, funnier, more creative, more helpful. Perhaps we will end up not alone together, but deeply connected… bots included.

Video conferencing with cardboard cutouts and random images on the walls

Hey, here’s an idea: How about creating an avatar by copying a face from a photo and pasting it onto a randomly generated avatar? Then a video conferencing service could put your brand new (or old) face, along with those of your friends, into one of several rooms, where you could all chat by voice. You could even display live video from your webcam or computer on the walls.

Wacky idea, eh? Yaletown Venture Partners and a number of angel investors don’t think so. They just forked over $1.4 million in a new seed funding round to Mingleverse (which runs this service) to help expand its social network version on Facebook, says VentureBeat.

Here’s a tour explaining how it works on Facebook.

OK, wait. I’m actually getting interested in this wacky thing. Sorta like Second Life without the complex user interface and bizarre avatars. OK, I just created a MingleRoom (that’s it over there on the left  – well, I didn’t actually create it; it just appeared automagically), with a MinglePro account (25 people max), and I scheduled a Mingle for tonight (Friday) at 9 PM PST. (I have no idea what I’m doing, really.)

Now what? If only I knew someone who was signed up with Mingleverse…. Anyone? Send me an invite request and a link to your Facebook page. (Here’s mine.)